The Costliest Failure In Recruiting – “Settling” For The Number 2 Candidate

You won’t hire a number 2 candidate for a critical job after you discover the high cost of settling. The definition of “settling” includes “accepting less than the best.” To me, that doesn’t sound like a desirable recruiting result. Until now, after losing your number one candidate, you most likely thought that offering the job to your second-ranked candidate (or lower) was the natural thing to do.

But most won’t likely continue that practice after they learn about the staggering performance drop-off that occurs when you “settle” on your number 2 (or worse) candidate.

The two best alternatives to settling

See also  TA Tech Business NewZ – Aspen’s Labor Market Update Amid BLS Delays & Raising VC Funding as a Non-AI SaaS Company
,

Subscribe to Recruiting Headlines

* indicates required

RECRUITMENT MARKETPLACE


»Free CRM Audit from Dalia


»See how your employer brand stacks up against the competition with CLEO Ai


»The Diversity Job Board


»HR Technology Wire


»HR News


»Job Board Directory


»Optimize Your Recruitment Marketing with Jobsync


»Recruiting Newsletters


»HR Tech News


»Jobs with Relocation Assistance


»Recruiter Ebooks