The Costliest Failure In Recruiting – “Settling” For The Number 2 Candidate

This is a preview. View original post on this site


You won’t hire a number 2 candidate for a critical job after you discover the high cost of settling. The definition of “settling” includes “accepting less than the best.” To me, that doesn’t sound like a desirable recruiting result. Until now, after losing your number one candidate, you most likely thought that offering the job to your second-ranked candidate (or lower) was the natural thing to do.

But most won’t likely continue that practice after they learn about the staggering performance drop-off that occurs when you “settle” on your number 2 (or worse) candidate.

The two best alternatives to settling

Read Complete Article

See also  Extended Recruiting – Stops Recruiters From Dropping New-Hires “Over The Wall” (The benefits of remaining in touch)
,

Subscribe to Recruiting Headlines

* indicates required

RECRUITMENT MARKETPLACE


»Free CRM Audit from Dalia


»See how your employer brand stacks up against the competition with CLEO Ai


»The Diversity Job Board


»HR Technology Wire


»HR News


»Job Board Directory


»Optimize Your Recruitment Marketing with Jobsync


»Recruiting Newsletters


»HR Tech News


»Jobs with Relocation Assistance


»Recruiter Ebooks