This guy’s discrimination claims were so bad. (How bad were they?)

This is a preview. View original post on this site

They were so bad that a federal judge applied a rarely-used rule of civil procedure to consider summary judgment on its own after identifying for the parties material facts that may not be genuinely in dispute.

Boy, that was about as witty as Groundskeeper Willie’s standup routine at Springfield Elementary.

(Note to self: take after the Clown.)

Early last month, the court determined that no reasonable jury would conclude that the 62-year-old plaintiff could prevail on his claims of age discrimination because another 62-year-old man took over his job duties.

Naturally, the court remained skeptical about the viability of the

Read Complete Article


Subscribe to Recruiting Headlines

* indicates required


»Shortlisting Service - Get 10 Candidates Quick!

»Cliquify: Employer Brand Platform

»Free Rejection Email Templates

»Text Recruiting Software

»HR Podcast Directory

»Recruiting Newsletters

»HR Tech News

»HR Jobs

»Diversity Hiring News

»Recruiter Ebooks