More on Why Holding Lawyers Liable for Retaliation to a Client’s Employee is a Bad Ruling

This is a preview. View original post on this site

Yesterday’s post discussing Arias v. Raimondo as the worst employment-law decision of 2017 was way more controversial than I imagined. To me, it’s a no-brainer.

It’s dangerous for courts to hold an employer’s lawyer liable for retaliation against the employees of the lawyer’s client. It will chill an attorney’s ability to give proper advice to one’s client, because anything that remotely could result in an employee suffering an adverse action could, under the logic of Arias, give rise to a retaliation claim. Then the comments rolled in:

As I said earlier, bad facts make bad law. Yes, the lawyer in this case blew the

Read Complete Article



»Free Job Postings

»Outsource Your Digital Recruiting

»Promote Your Next Hiring Event

»Hire Vets with